Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

290RC1 fsc has issues with absolute/relative paths #4395

Closed
scabug opened this issue Mar 27, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

290RC1 fsc has issues with absolute/relative paths #4395

scabug opened this issue Mar 27, 2011 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

scabug commented Mar 27, 2011

Just trying to head off ticket creation while I fix it.

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 27, 2011

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4395?orig=1
Reporter: @paulp

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 27, 2011

@paulp said:
(In r24610) Trying to get fsc doing the right thing with respect to absolute
and relative paths. My knowledge of the problem had heretofore been
second hand, and my understanding of it incomplete. The real problem
I have determined is that there are a bunch of different things which
go wrong if relative paths start being resolved from a different base,
each of which needs custom handling.

classpath-style options, e.g. fsc -cp ../foo.jar
path-style options, e.g. fsc -d ../mydir
file arguments, e.g. fsc ../foo.scala

So it was more work than I had realized, or I probably wouldn't have
even touched it. But now it seems to be working as one would want.
I also poured some readability onto the fsc help output.

Closes #4395, no review, but community input would be great.

@scabug scabug closed this as completed May 18, 2011
@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jan 7, 2012

@SethTisue said (edited on Jan 7, 2012 12:23:51 AM UTC):
in the past week on IRC, I've had two different people using Scala 2.9.1 have classpath problems that when I told them to use -nocompdaemon, the problems suddenly went away. anecdotal, but it seems this isn't fixed.

I'm not actually reopening this though, not having steps to reproduce.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants