Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.9.1.RC1 is incompatible with sbt 0.7 #4838

Closed
scabug opened this issue Jul 25, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

2.9.1.RC1 is incompatible with sbt 0.7 #4838

scabug opened this issue Jul 25, 2011 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

scabug commented Jul 25, 2011

see discussion at http://groups.google.com/group/scala-language/browse_frm/thread/1eda2d30c742bc17

"sbt 0.7.7 isn't working with 2.9.1.RC1 probably because 25068 is missing" - Johannes Rudolph

[info] == console == 
[info] 'compiler-interface' not yet compiled for Scala 2.9.1.RC1. Compiling... 
/tmp/sbt_17e60b52/LoggerReporter.scala:27: error: not found: value 
countElementsAsString 
                        log.warn(Message(countElementsAsString(WARNING.count, "warning") + " found")) 
                                         ^ 
/tmp/sbt_17e60b52/LoggerReporter.scala:29: error: not found: value 
countElementsAsString 
                        log.error(Message(countElementsAsString(ERROR.count, "error") + " found")) 
                                          ^ 
two errors found 

(error is the same on my own setup - Seth T)

"compiler-interface needs to retain binary compatibility... Fixing the error shown above is easy, but the question of what needs to retain compatibility and the verification that it is indeed compatible is more uncertain.)" - Paul Phillips

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jul 25, 2011

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4838?orig=1
Reporter: @SethTisue

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jul 26, 2011

@paulp said:
Fixed in RC2.

@scabug scabug closed this as completed Jul 26, 2011
@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jul 26, 2011

@SethTisue said:
svn rev of fix is r25368

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants