New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scaladoc: hide complex definitions behind use cases #5054
Comments
Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-5054?orig=1 |
Commit Message Bot (anonymous) said: If use cases are present, the original member disappears from the list. References #5054, but needs more work on the html part. Review by kzys. |
@soc said:
I'm not sure all problems are solvable with the current design. |
@VladUreche said: 1 - Yes, the whole body with the signature and example will appear inside the use case (this is just a partial fix) |
@soc said: |
@soc said: I think that would be really the key improvement if people could easily read and understand
I think a @notice with some ScalaDoc macro could do that... |
@dcsobral said: |
@VladUreche said:
|
@dcsobral said: |
@VladUreche said: |
@VladUreche said: |
Scaladoc: hide complex definitions behind use cases rather than showing both the complex definition and use cases
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: