Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

foldRight should be documented to be unusable on long lists (if it's not fixed) #6922

Closed
scabug opened this issue Jan 6, 2013 · 6 comments
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

scabug commented Jan 6, 2013

Currently foldRight overflows on long lists. Martin Odersky recommended to use reverse.foldLeft, but no such recommendation appears in the ScalaDocs - see discussion in #3295. But now #3295 is being discussed again in this topic
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scala-internals/RrmfYQpTTfc/discussion
but if nothing happens there, documentation should be fixed (I volunteer to do that, if this bug is accepted).

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jan 6, 2013

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-6922?orig=1
Reporter: @Blaisorblade
Affected Versions: 2.10.0
See #3295, #2818

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jan 23, 2013

@adriaanm said:
Documentation improvements always welcome!

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jan 23, 2013

@Blaisorblade said:
Thanks for the assignment, but there's hope that it's fixed. To ensure that #2818 is reviewed, I've taken the liberty of scheduling the bug.

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jan 23, 2013

@Blaisorblade said:
BTW, is it intentional that I recently got such privileges (I'm in jira-developers)?

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Jan 28, 2013

@adriaanm said:
it is -- with great power...

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Feb 5, 2013

@retronym said:
Closing as 'won't fix' because #2818 addressed the underlying problem head on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants