Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-7225?orig=1
Reporter: Bruno Grieder (bgrieder)
Affected Versions: 2.10.0, 2.10.1-RC2, 2.10.1

@adriaanm said:
This is due to a Java limitation. In your original code, there's an inherited get method from HashTable that differs only in result type. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9439379/why-does-java-enforce-return-type-compatibility-for-overridden-static-methods

Please experiment with variations on the following minimal example to see the error more directly.

class Super {
  // uncomment this and comment the last definition of get for the original report
  // def get(): Any = null
}

class Foo extends Super

object Foo {
  // no static forwarder generated in Foo when there's already one in Super
  def get(): Foo = new Foo
  // can't have two static methods with signatures that differ only in their return type
  def get(): Any = null
}

Bruno Grieder (bgrieder) said (edited on Mar 13, 2013 4:38:24 PM UTC):
I re-open this because get() is NOT a static method on HashMap. What you describe is true for static methods collisions only.

Actually, this is exactly the opposite: it is a Scala limitation; java does not have this limitation. For proof consider this

In Scala

import java.util.HashMap

class HashMapScala extends HashMap[ String, String ] {

}

object HashMapScala {
    
    def get() : String = "dummy"
}

In java

import java.util.HashMap;


public class HashMapJava extends HashMap<String, String> {

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

	public static String get() {
		
		return "dummy";
	}
}

In java, the static get() method is available in the the compiled code along with the non static get() method inherited from Hashmap.
The static get() method is not available in the compiled code generated by the Scala compiler.

My bet is that the scala compiler only checks for method name collisions but does not check, as it should and javac does, for the methods signature: method name AND arguments. Only in the latter case you cannot have both a static and non static method generated.

@retronym said:
Yes, that's what it does:

https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/v2.10.0/src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/backend/jvm/GenASM.scala#L1161

The method is accessible to Java via MyProperties.MODULE$.get().

Bruno Grieder (bgrieder) said (edited on Mar 14, 2013 6:00:36 AM UTC):
I am no going to discuss the fact that it has been moved to Minor (your choice) but just want to make you aware of the consequences of this issue.

When you port Java code to Scala you may be caught in a situation where you have to port a Java Class that implements such a static method - and you can't. This is exactly what happened to us. You are then left with 2 choices if you want avoid breaking the rest of the code

• implement the type workaround described above, and since the Object and Class have different names, hope that the rest of the code never tries to cast to the Object name when doing a get e.g; in Java : (MyMap) MyMap.get
• refactor the rest of the code to either import the type or completely change the name of the static get() method

Unfortunately, you cannot always refactor the rest of the code and you are just doomed.
One of the big marketing stints of Scala is that it is completely inter-operable with Java; well, as we discovered, not completely, no.

@adriaanm said:
Bruno, thanks for bearing with us. I'm sorry your porting experience was less than ideal.

We're aware that Scala's approach to static methods is not ideal in the context of java interop. We've recently been discussing a new approach for code generation of methods in objects: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/scala-internals/vOps4k8CADY/-1k-08KRBzkJ

I agree our interop story needs work here, so I've adjusted the priority.