New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
require explicit result type for implicit conversions? #801
Comments
Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-801?orig=1 |
@mcdirmid said: |
@dubochet said: |
@odersky said: |
@odersky said: |
Martin wrote on the scala-user list, "In general it's a good idea always to write a result type for an implicit method. Maybe the language should require it."
I've been bitten myself a couple times by problems that went away once I added a result type to an implicit so I thought I'd open a ticket on this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: