Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate JavaConversions #9684

Closed
scabug opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 9 comments
Closed

Deprecate JavaConversions #9684

scabug opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

scabug commented Mar 3, 2016

JavaConversions should be deprecated in favor of JavaConverters

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 3, 2016

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-9684?orig=1
Reporter: @lrytz

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 25, 2016

@SethTisue said:
hey community — anybody want to put together a PR for this?

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 26, 2016

@som-snytt said:
because why should soc have all the fun?

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 26, 2016

@som-snytt said:
scala/scala#5064 and scala/docs.scala-lang#509

Previous work on the hardest problem in computer science: scala/scala@5d555ef

The naming convention didn't quite take. Was 2012 a long time ago or like yesterday? Git history, even when not squashed, seems to flatten all time.

Why can't we do this?

import JavaConver{sions,ters}._

Quote of the day: "Initially motivated by #5580, then just motivated."

Doesn't typelevel.org offer a t-shirt that says, "Initially motivated by #2712, then just motivated."

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 27, 2016

Kieran Tully (kieran.tully-at-gmail.com) said:
You got there before me!

See also scala/scala#5065 for minor addition to your nice work.

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Apr 4, 2016

@szeiger said:
Reassigning to M5. We'd probably want a change like this before the RC cycle starts.

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Apr 4, 2016

@som-snytt said:
Lukas suggested doc on the collection.convert._ members, which isn't done yet.

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Apr 4, 2016

@lrytz said:
I'm happy to do the docs work, but i'd love to get some more opinions on my proposals on scala/scala#5064.

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Apr 28, 2016

@som-snytt said:
scala/scala#5109

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants