Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Precedence of infix operators in SLS (patch included) #5209

Closed
scabug opened this issue Nov 21, 2011 · 3 comments
Closed

Precedence of infix operators in SLS (patch included) #5209

scabug opened this issue Nov 21, 2011 · 3 comments
Assignees
@adriaanm
Labels
language spec
Milestone
2.11.0-RC3

Comments

@scabug
Copy link

scabug commented Nov 21, 2011

Precedence of infix operators that starting with '=' or '!' is incorrectly listed in SLS (6.12.3 Infix Operations).
This was already confirmed ([http://groups.google.com/group/scala-language/msg/1bd28a7d3a39bf9c]) but still not fixed.

See also:

  • [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7022207/why-scala-changed-relative-precedence-of-relational-vs-equality-operators-compa]
  • [http://groups.google.com/group/scala-language/browse_thread/thread/51bde08394afb578]
  • [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7618923/actual-precedence-for-infix-operators-in-scala]
@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Nov 21, 2011

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-5209?orig=1
Reporter: Eugen Labun (labun)
Attachments:

@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Oct 15, 2013

@gkossakowski said:
Unassigning and rescheduling to M7 as previous deadline was missed.

@scabug scabug closed this as completed Mar 12, 2014
@scabug
Copy link
Author

scabug commented Mar 12, 2014

@adriaanm said:
Fixed in markdown spec.

@scabug scabug added this to the 2.11.0-RC3 milestone Apr 7, 2017
@scabug scabug mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2017
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@adriaanm adriaanm

Labels
language spec
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.11.0-RC3
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@adriaanm @scabug